Cosa vuol dire oggi rappresentanza?
Visto come vanno le cose nel nostro Paese, ha senso delegare ad altri la tutela dei propri interessi?
Partiti, sindacati e associazioni di categoria raccolgono ancora la nostra fiducia?
A Padova di chi ci si può fidare per mettere in comune i propri problemi imprenditoriali?
Il mio pensiero è che la rappresentanza sia importante e utile, ma che sia superato il modo con il quale la si è fatta fino ad oggi.
Occorre un modello diverso di relazione e di sintesi progettuale tra persone che condividono interessi comuni.
In altre parole: è finita un’epoca e stiamo vivendone already another without even being fully aware. An end
produced and fed by the growing individualism and selfishness of the ruling class in recent decades.
People insatiable, constantly going through withdrawal of power, money and social role, no sense of limit, no scruples, no morals.
A representation without ethics, but good to preach good scratch bad.
A representative willing to do anything not to lose the privileges built betraying the trust and squandering the resources of their members.
I think the advice to friends, relatives or even the positions of any administrator who has given himself. I think
the representation costs consumed at dinners, conferences and studies.
I think the compensation for presidents, advisers, for the secretaries general and directors and several executives.
In associations, there are people with the eighth grade (forse!) who lives in fees and compensation to warm up the chair on the boards of the service companies.
People insignificant contributions of ideas, management skills, spirit of enterprise, but ideal to be used by some pimp tramaccione.
Take for example the UPA, the association that I know best and I can speak for knowledge.
Finished the collateral with Christian Democracy , the UPA has had to walk with the legs of its owner.
Slowly, slowly emerged all the limits and contradictions of directors Craft: lack of education, inability to work as a team, extreme jealousy and envy internal desire to appear socially and to feel important.
dependent on all of this some old jackal (bastard son of the First Republic) has played and continues to do so today.
No longer the filter of DC that could form and select the best people at the helm, the most seasoned of the second, third and fourth lines have had the opportunity of their life to occupy the front row.
A leap that initiated the loss of credibility of the representation.
The example is emblematic of UPA!
was the first association of entrepreneurs in Padua and the Veneto.
Among the bigger and stronger at the national level.
In little more than a decade is one of many that you drag more than others struggled year after year.
To survive, he opened the door to external financing partners, it is up to their necks in debt, has asked for help to other associations to maintain important services for members such as the café, the guarantee credit, services for environment, safety and 'innovation.
now finds himself to be a reality where members have an average age of over 50 years, which has lost its original identity and is run by a few close friends with the logic of "before and after someone decided to weight Perhaps we discussed. "
Everything has been sold to members as a great achievement, a need to do something big and new, a duty to make a system, looking for new models of representation.
A few years later the results are visible to everyone. More and more artisans
Padua decided to go it alone (to say it is the collapse in the number and quality of members).
They opened my eyes Craft inconsistency of those managers who write the papers to represent the banking system or the Chamber of Commerce, but then in practice be very well paid and sat on the Board of Directors of the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio or in that of the Executive Chamber of Commerce.
The seat of these men in these two very important and very heavy tables, what benefit to the artisans of Padua?
This is the representation of the artisans in Padua Padua?
A beautiful reflection should be made up as is the recruitment system of the leadership of UPA.
Last election it was a clear and shameful testimony: una grande presa in giro, funzionale al mantenimento delle cose così come sono, a tutela delle rendite di posizione dei soliti amici.
O si è funzionali al burattinaio o si fa la fine del topo!
Non mi vergogno a dirlo, anzi ne sono profondamente fiero…io ho fatto quella fine!
Escluso dalla corsa alla presidenza dell’Upa perché troppo animato da democrazia, progettualità e voglia di rappresentanza a favore della base associativa.
Non bisogna però arrendersi e mollare! Assolutamente no!
La rappresentanza è una cosa troppo seria ed onesta per lasciarla in mani sporche.
La rappresentanza deve ritornare ad essere oggetto d’interessamento e di investimento da parte di tutti, a partire dall’istituzione pubblica che, su questo ambito, deve lavorare ad un serio e profondo progetto di riforma.
Penso al sistema delle Camere di commercio, la casa degli imprenditori.
Occorre ridefinire l’identità, il ruolo ed il sistema di governo delle Camere di commercio, rimaste indietro rispetto alle trasformazioni economiche avvenute in questi ultimi anni.
Una seria ridefinizione delle Camere di Commercio, avrebbe una sana e utile conseguenza sulla rappresentanza del mondo economico del Paese (artigianato, industria, commercio, servizi e agricoltura), Upa compresa.
In virtù di queste considerazioni e la convinzione che l'attuale sistema della rappresentanza non abbia la capacità di autoriformarsi, occorre una rinnovata speranza nel domani dove "la paura del futuro si vince solo con un soprassalto di partecipazione".
Le condizioni ci sono, le idee e le persone pure!
Anche a Padova l'embrione di una rinnovata consapevolezza e impegno, è nato!
0 comments:
Post a Comment