Dear COLLECTED FOR AUDITORS, I waited in vain for the publication of my last response to Gandalf. As for the argument Ronghi, once again you have censored my new contribution, probably because it was judged too little "moderate" compared to the line of soporific blog, which, among other things, seems to be low "popular." Better perhaps to avoid giving a voice to critics uncomfortable, obviously located outside the fences too "ideological" a destrismo asphyxiated by which you move with the utmost circumspection and caution not to disturb too much the manipulator of the moment. It matters little, however, because if this is the line you want to perpetuate, not much I can affect a court of the miracles of modern UGL. And what I said in my speech on Ronghi seems to be more comforted by news that the rupture of relations between Fini and Polverini (after flirting so indecently, political means, the face of workers, particularly those enrolled in the UGL) because of the failure application of the companion of Campania. Nothing but courage! Other than idealism! As you said improperly in the editorial of the blog (collected by Solidarity trade union) is, in my humble opinion, a sly position to give the classic shot at the rim and the barrel. What c'azzecca, In fact, no candidate in a company as a party-NA (by Protester in specific) issues with absolutely antithetical to the political activism such as participation, co-management or even socializing? I consider a real insult to the intelligence of all workers enrolled in the UGL, including myself, want to publish only the action "celebration" of the character in question (the example signature Ciro Luis is one of the most obvious), Cassano, pitilessly dissenting voices, while respecting the right code "of ethics," stated by you in the "clarification" published in the blog on April 2. But I was very pleased to have saw action in Italy published a Social, which I always follow with great interest, even more so given the fact that in this case the sacrosanct online newspaper critical of the article is on the same level of toughness and fairness, in 'framework of respect for social ethics standards that govern the behavior of the writer, of my previous actions by you mercilessly censored. However, if you want to start a contradictory, given that you dare not do it "publicly" through the blog, and simplifies the task by entering an address to which you can send your possible replies ........... Best wishes for your virtual "battle carbonara. VIVA The UGL socialization GERONIMO
0 comments:
Post a Comment